<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clynelish &#8211; Slowdrink.de</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.slowdrink.de/tag/clynelish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.slowdrink.de</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Review: The X-Mas Releases of the Scotch Malt Whisky Society I. (Highland Park, Clynelish, Laphroaig, Ardbeg, Caol Ila, Port Charlotte)</title>
		<link>https://www.slowdrink.de/2011/11/smws-x-mas-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Scotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisk(e)y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[127.11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[26.71]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[29.97]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[33.97]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4.151]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg 12 years old SMWS 33.97 refill Bourbon Hogshead 1997]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benotung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bewertung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caol ila]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caol Ila 10 y.o. SMWS 53.147 refill bourbon hogshead 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clynelish SMWS 26.71 refill sherry butt 25 y.o. 1984]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmacksnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greatest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highland park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highland park 26 years old smws 4.151 1984 y.o. 53% Refill Sherry Butt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kritik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laphroaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laphroaig 20 y.o. SMWS 29.97 refill sherry butt 608 btl.1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Charlotte 7 y.o. SMWS 127.11 Refill Sherry Butt 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Malt Whisky Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tastingnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostungsnotiz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.slowdrink.de/?p=1661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The new SMWS Christmas Releases Tomorrow the German chapter of the Scotch Malt Whisky Society will present their new releases for Christmas time. Our friend Ralf Dänzer and I don&#8217;t want you to find any bad drams underneath the X-mas &#8230; <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/2011/11/smws-x-mas-1/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The new SMWS Christmas Releases</strong></p>
<p>Tomorrow the German chapter of the Scotch Malt Whisky Society will present their new releases for Christmas time. Our friend Ralf Dänzer and I don&#8217;t want you to find any bad drams underneath the X-mas tree &#8211; that&#8217;s why he sent me some samples via the reindeer express yesterday. Blitzen looked kind of hammered, maybe it tried from the Port Charlotte <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f609.png" alt="😉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> .</p>
<p><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/smws-christmas-reindeers1.bmp"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1668" title="smws christmas reindeers" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/smws-christmas-reindeers1.bmp" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As the most-wanted-distillery bottlings sell out quickly, I tasted them right away to give you a notion. Good luck in filling your stockings with these releases. I couldn&#8217;t find a bad one yet.<span id="more-1661"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Highland Park 26 y.o. SMWS 4.151, 1984, Refill Sherry Butt, 53%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Quite spicy in the nose at first, the Sherry is talking loud and clearly,  then it smoothens out with maritime freshness and gets much rounder. Soft smoke, honey, Turkish delight, apples and cider, peaches, Werthers Original toffee, café au lait, nice dark wood and a spicy backbone of white pepper and chili. Nice but incomparable to the amazing palate. It drinks beautifully and is a dream of balance that still has power, the Sherry is well-integrated, heavy and light at the same time. Water makes it creamier and more accessible. Long finish.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 90</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Clynelish 25 y.o. SMWS 26.71, 1984 &#8211; 2010, Refill Sherry Butt, 57,3%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Very typical Clynelish (apples, candlewax, tropical fruit, quince, maritime air with a hint of peat smoke and all that jazz) in the nose. A fine balance with the fruit as spearhead hits the palate, also vanilla now. A soft and fruity Clynelish with a medium finish. Water is not necessary but makes it a bit more spicy and interesting.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 89</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Laphroaig 20 y.o. SMWS 29.97, 10.1990 &#8211; 2011, Refill Sherry Butt, 608 btl., 59,1%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Tyrolian bacon and a red Passito, that&#8217;s what I would call it. Rooty peat, camphor, herbs, juniper, Stilton cheese, sulphur, dirty machine oil, and other unusual notes for a Laphroaig. The Sherry really changed the spirit to a great extent &#8211; into a profile not everybody likes (lost identity, lots of personality). The palate also is Sherry- and sulphur-dominated, gunpowder, roots, camphor, blue cheese again, not bad but different. It reminds me a bit of the 1974 Singatory Sherry bottling, but without the old Laphroaig characterstics. Really hard to judge&#8230;some will love this, some might call it flawed. I would have liked more Laphroaig in my glass but enjoyed the dram anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Score 90+</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Ardbeg 12 y.o. SMWS 33.97, 09.10.1997, Refill Bourbon Hogshead, 55,5%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Recent Ardbegs from the Society were convincing and this is not an exception. It is a textbook example of an Ardbeg of that particular time, a really well-balanced one again. More old than new style in the nose but on the palate you discover, among typical Ardbeg characteristics, the newer notes of eucalypt, methol and cactus that came into the distillate after 1996 in general. Green Ardbeg so to speak &#8211; with a great finish.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 90+</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Caol Ila 10y.o. SMWS 53.147, 11.1999, Refill Bourbon Hogshead, 66,6%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Very intense and herbal, big Islay power, flints, but it needs some drops of water to be tamed. No offnotes, simply great Caol Ila with depth. I recommend this for anyone who loves young South Coasters that do their job well.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91-</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Port Charlotte 7 y.o. SMWS 127.11, 8.2003 &#8211; 2011, Refill Sherry Butt, 67,1%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Smells a bit like one of those PCs out of a Sherry Bloodtub, broodingly intense on rooty peat, camphor, herbs, tar, ox tail soup and Sherry. Blue cheese, dried flowers, moss, toffee, pepper and coffee complete the bouquet. You might not believe this, but it is drinkable at 67,1% without needing water. Anyway, it can swim too. The power on the mid-palate and the endless finish are ridiculous. Another stunner PC &#8211; how excellent will these monsters be with more maturity?</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91+</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasting Legends: Ardbeg 1967 Kingsbury 29 y.o. (both) and a Brora 30 from 2009</title>
		<link>https://www.slowdrink.de/2011/10/legends-ardbeg-brora/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Scotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisk(e)y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1967]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1973]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1974]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1996]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2652]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[29 y.o.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[922]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[933]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg Kingsbury 1967]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bewertung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brora 30 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islay best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingsbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostungsnotiz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.slowdrink.de/?p=1183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many people talk their mouths fuzzy about the 20 y.o. dark Ardbeg 1991 that has just been released by MoS for the Bero hotel. That inspired me to post two other dark Ardbegs today &#8211; the Kingsbury 1967 versions &#8211; &#8230; <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/2011/10/legends-ardbeg-brora/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people talk their mouths fuzzy about the <strong>20 y.o. dark Ardbeg 1991</strong> that has just been released by MoS for the Bero hotel. That inspired me to post two other dark Ardbegs today &#8211; the <strong>Kingsbury 1967</strong> versions &#8211; Serge Valentins favourite expressions. Kingsbury has an amazing track record in bottling fine drams. So let&#8217;s see what their flagships<span id="more-1183"></span> are capable of. Before we cut to the chase, I tasted a nice <strong>Brora 30</strong> to warm up my tastebuds for the rare treat.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Brora 30 y.o. OB 1979 &#8211; 2009, 2652 btl., 53,2%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Nose:</strong> A bit aggressive at first, a peaty heat comes from the glass (chili, black and white  pepper), green apples, peaches, lemons,<a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Brora-30-2009.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1197" title="Brora 30 2009" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Brora-30-2009-150x300.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Brora-30-2009-150x300.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Brora-30-2009-75x150.jpg 75w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Brora-30-2009.jpg 301w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" /></a> medicinical iodine, leather, maritime freshness, vanilla, herbs and weeds, candlewax, sugared egg-cream (dessert).</p>
<p><strong>Palate:</strong> Peatier and deeper in character than the nose suggested, no water needed; The fruits manage to hold on to the spicy ride. Wonderful fight between the peat-, the spice- and the fruit-related combo!</p>
<p><strong>Finish:</strong> Peat, iodine, green apples, bandaid, slightly sulphury, chalk. Very long.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91+</strong></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Another great Brora, that seems slightly Clynelish in character, but with more peat and spice. Thanks to Flo for the sample.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Ardbeg 29 y.o., 1967 &#8211; 1996, Sherry Cask 923, 52%</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1198" style="width: 195px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-Kingsbury-smaller.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1198" class="size-medium wp-image-1198" title="Ardbeg 1967 Kingsbury smaller" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-Kingsbury-smaller-185x300.jpg" alt="" width="185" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-Kingsbury-smaller-185x300.jpg 185w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-Kingsbury-smaller-92x150.jpg 92w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-Kingsbury-smaller.jpg 216w" sizes="(max-width: 185px) 100vw, 185px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-1198" class="wp-caption-text">A Legend: Ardbeg 1967 Kingsbury (thanks for photo to M. Höflmaier)</p></div>
<p><strong>Nose:</strong> Dark not only in colour, I get mahogani wood, Sherry of the finest kind, peat, pepper, moss, roots, herbs (catnip, lemon balm verbena, even chamomile!), forest honey, dark fruits of all kind, old tires, Culatello ham, dark chocolate and nougat, espresso, tobacco, Vermouth, Pu Erh-tea, a dusty wooden boathouse at the seaside on a hot summer day. Really unusual.</p>
<p><strong>Palate:</strong> Utterly complex, like a mix of 1970 Ardbeg, Port Charlotte and a dash of Black Bowmore, with the notes from above, but fruitier, also wet plank. It displays a real pleasant taste of its own. Don&#8217;t let water come close within a mile <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f609.png" alt="😉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
<p><strong>Finish:</strong> Long, satisfying, peaty, sulphury (my beloved children&#8217;s gun sulphur), dark fruits (plums!), nougat honey, fir resin and what not. Goes on forever.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 94-</strong></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> Rather unusual Ardbeg (but there IS distillery character, don&#8217;t get me wrong), but high class and very original. I like it, but it is not my favourite expression of the distillery. I also loved the 1972, 1973 and 1974 Kingsbury Ardbegs, esp. the 1974 was exactly my style!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Ardbeg 29 y.o., 1967 &#8211; 1996, Sherry Cask 922, 54,6%<a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-label2.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1201" title="Ardbeg 1967 label" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-label2-248x300.jpg" alt="" width="248" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-label2-248x300.jpg 248w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-label2-124x150.jpg 124w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ardbeg-1967-label2.jpg 366w" sizes="(max-width: 248px) 100vw, 248px" /></a></strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Score: 94</strong></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> I had this one in Limburg &#8222;live&#8220; with some friends at the Dutch Connection stand, so no full notes, sorry. It deserved the same score but it had more Sherry influence (making it fruitier &#8211; even with some berries &#8211; and nuttier)  and less honey, as I think back. It also seemed slightly more approachable and elegant (so 94 without the &#8222;-&#8222;, but both bottlings are unique and legendary! Try them if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
