<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Octomore 5 y.o. Comus 04.2_167 Bruichladdich Sauternes &#8211; Slowdrink.de</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.slowdrink.de/tag/octomore-5-y-o-comus-04-2_167-bruichladdich-sauternes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.slowdrink.de</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Review: Two Peated Laddies (Octomore Comus and Port Charlotte MoS)</title>
		<link>https://www.slowdrink.de/2012/04/review-two-peated-laddies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Scotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisk(e)y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bewertung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Degustation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmacksnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kritik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[München]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octomore 5 y.o. Comus 04.2_167 Bruichladdich Sauternes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pit Krause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Charlotte 2001 - 2010 Malts of Scotland MoS Bourbon Barrel Cask 967]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regensburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seminar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slowdrink.de]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting-Notiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tastingnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostungsnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisky-Verkostung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years old]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.slowdrink.de/?p=2959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At Bruichladdich they seem to be keen on the record of the peatiest malt &#8211; which is Octomore with ever higher ppm-levels in terms of phenol. As weird as it sounds, the less phenolic Port Charlotte tastes way peatier (and &#8230; <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/2012/04/review-two-peated-laddies/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Bruichladdich they seem to be keen on the record of the peatiest malt &#8211; which is Octomore with ever higher ppm-levels in terms of phenol. As weird as it sounds, the less phenolic Port Charlotte tastes way peatier (and more complex) than the Guinness-Book dram. Here comes another comparison of the two:<span id="more-2959"></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Octomore 5 y.o. &#8218;Comus 04.2_167&#8216;, Bourbon/Sauternes Casks, 18.000 btl., 61</strong>%</span></p>
<p><strong>Nose:</strong> <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/chateau-dyquem-casks.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2970" title="chateau d'yquem casks" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/chateau-dyquem-casks-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/chateau-dyquem-casks-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/chateau-dyquem-casks-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/chateau-dyquem-casks.jpg 612w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>Octomore finished in Sauternes Casks (Chateau d&#8217;Yquem) &#8211; not as peaty and strong as the mere facts would suggest, the Sauternes is there from the beginning, having a calming and smoothening effect on the rough Islay dram altogether. These two worlds meet here and make it unusual: Islay (peat and bonfire smoke, tar, white pepper, hot chili, herbs, camphor, resin and fresh sea air) and d&#8217;Yquem&#8217;s Sauternes wine (apricots, peaches, apples, honeysuckle, toffee caramel, butter, vanilla, almonds and macadamia). The winey shoe fits, I think &#8211; in fact, this is one of the most intense Sauternes influences I had in a while. Daddy like <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f609.png" alt="😉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> !</p>
<p><strong>Palate:</strong> The palate is a bit hot and nervous, mainly on herbs, peat and camphor, but in the back the grapey fruitiness hangs on, making it somehow voluptuous. No water needed.</p>
<p><strong>Finish:</strong> Peat smoke, resin, burning embers, sulphur and chalk, then some of the wine&#8217;s influence. Quaffable stuff. But the very first edition was even better and deeper.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 88+</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Port Charlotte 8 y.o. Malts of Scotland 14.12.2001 &#8211; 2.2010, MoS Bourbon Barrel 967, 220 btl., 60,2%</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Nose:</strong><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Port-Charlotte-2001-Bourbon-MoS-Cask-967.png"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2974" title="Port Charlotte 2001 Bourbon MoS Cask 967" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Port-Charlotte-2001-Bourbon-MoS-Cask-967-125x300.png" alt="" width="125" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Port-Charlotte-2001-Bourbon-MoS-Cask-967-125x300.png 125w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Port-Charlotte-2001-Bourbon-MoS-Cask-967-62x150.png 62w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Port-Charlotte-2001-Bourbon-MoS-Cask-967.png 248w" sizes="(max-width: 125px) 100vw, 125px" /></a> This one is weird at first, like a mentholated cigarette, or more like a peated Benedictine herb liqueur. Smells healthy to me, just like a chest rub. Definitely unusual. These first aromas take to the background after a minute, giving way to vanilla and the more typical PC character traits (oysters, peat, altogether rooty). Somehow this is really plant-like, THE gardener&#8217;s dram. The more you wait the more it becomes a son of Islay. Chalk, wet sheep wool, almonds, tobacco, citrus notes and pepper round it off.</p>
<p><strong>Palate:</strong> This dram can&#8217;t be serious. Now it shook off all the Benedictine and healty stuff and tastes more like old Ardbeg (minus the iodine-tire-mix), I kid you not! Some dashes of water are needed. It is on the dry side, also reminscences of Port Ellen come to mind, but on a less complex level.</p>
<p><strong>Finish:</strong> Late matchstick sulphur and chalky dark wood accompany the notes of the palate, very intense and lingering.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 90+</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
