<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talisker 10 y.o. OB Split Label from 1990ies &#8211; Slowdrink.de</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.slowdrink.de/tag/talisker-10-y-o-ob-split-label-from-1990ies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.slowdrink.de</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Review: Comparing two old Talisker 10 y.o. OB &#8218;Split Label&#8216;</title>
		<link>https://www.slowdrink.de/2012/05/review-talisker-split-label/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Scotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisk(e)y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bewertung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Degustation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmacksnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kritik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[München]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pit Krause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regensburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talisker 10 y.o. OB Split Label from 1990ies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting-Notiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostungsnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years old]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.slowdrink.de/?p=3027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Talisker 10 has always been a bang for yor buck, a great whisky at a fair price &#8211; and it still is. Rumour has it that the older versions are a bit better than today&#8217;s releases from Skye. In general &#8230; <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/2012/05/review-talisker-split-label/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talisker 10 has always been a bang for yor buck, a great whisky at a fair price &#8211; and it still is. Rumour has it that the older versions are a bit better than today&#8217;s releases from Skye. In general this is true for many distilleries. I am going to review two &#8218;Split Label&#8216; versions to find out. I have the 2011 Talisker 10 at 89+ points.<span id="more-3027"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Talisker 10 y.o. OB &#8218;Split Label&#8216; (bottled around 1887), 45,8%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/old-version-talisker-ten-10-years-old-OB-split-label.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3035" title="old version talisker ten 10 years old OB split label" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/old-version-talisker-ten-10-years-old-OB-split-label-239x300.jpg" alt="" width="239" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/old-version-talisker-ten-10-years-old-OB-split-label-239x300.jpg 239w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/old-version-talisker-ten-10-years-old-OB-split-label-119x150.jpg 119w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/old-version-talisker-ten-10-years-old-OB-split-label.jpg 479w" sizes="(max-width: 239px) 100vw, 239px" /></a>A modern classic. Wonderfully coastal with fresh sea air, salt, oysters, peat, pepper and a subtle fruitiness (pears, peaches, apples, lemon squash)  in the background. Also pine needles and resin, iodine, soot, farmyardy notes and discrete oak. Altogether this one is a bit Brora-esque (with the smell of rain coming in from the sea), which is a good thing. In perfect balance. On the palate it is just as lively, balanced and complex and finishes on all the notes mentioned in soft echoes.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Talisker 10 y.o. OB &#8218;Split Label&#8216; for Da Bema (Italy), distilled late 1970ies/early 1980ies, 75cl, 45,8%</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/talisker-ten-10-y.o.-split-label-da-bema-genova.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3036" title="talisker ten 10 y.o. split label da bema genova" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/talisker-ten-10-y.o.-split-label-da-bema-genova.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="200" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/talisker-ten-10-y.o.-split-label-da-bema-genova.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/talisker-ten-10-y.o.-split-label-da-bema-genova-112x150.jpg 112w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" /></a>The Italian version is said to be even better, and it is older than the version from above. Let&#8217;s see: This one plays it closer to the chest at first, deeper in tone and less vibrant, briny and salty in fact a bit dead in the glass. Wake up, honey! Some earthy aromas limp out of the glass, also pickles. Strange. After ten minutes, the fruit, peat and pepper are coming out with whiffs of mahogani wood, also some coffee beans, heather and some malty tones. Don&#8217;t rush this one! It keeps on evolving. Unfortunately it drinks a bit like a good old blend, no real chili catch or other things associated with this great Skye Malt &#8211; however, it is very oily, if that style is yours. Just a good dram, but nothing more. Was that sample taken from a tired bottle? I will check &#8230; I am a bit surprised.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 88</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
