<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Berry Bros.&amp; Rudd &#8211; Slowdrink.de</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.slowdrink.de/tag/berry-bros-rudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.slowdrink.de</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Review: Two Old Talisker (1955 and 1974)</title>
		<link>https://www.slowdrink.de/2012/02/talisker-old/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Scotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisk(e)y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berry Bros.& Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bewertung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cask 6268]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geschmacksnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon & Macphail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kritik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherry Cask 1312]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talisker 1955 Secret Stills 50 y.o.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talisker 1974 - 2001 BBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting-Notiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tastingnotiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verkostungsnotiz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.slowdrink.de/?p=2282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This Skye-born dram is one of the  true Single Malts with a unique profile that rarely fails to impress connoisseurs. However, I think it needs 9-10 years to age to reach this quality. Don&#8217;t judge it by younger versions like &#8230; <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/2012/02/talisker-old/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Skye-born dram is one of the  true Single Malts with a unique profile that rarely fails to impress connoisseurs. However, I think it needs 9-10 years to age to reach this quality. Don&#8217;t judge it by younger versions like the &#8217;57 degrees North&#8216;.<span id="more-2282"></span> The much better 10 y.o. is an all-time favourite, and older versions have a different charm which is more on complexity than on bite. Today, I am reviewing two nice specimen from the older days, namely 1974 and 1955:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Talisker Berry Bros. &amp; Rudd 1974 &#8211; 2001, Cask 6268, 43%<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1974-Berry-Bros.-Rudd.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2290" title="Talisker 1974 Berry Bros. &amp; Rudd" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1974-Berry-Bros.-Rudd-150x300.jpg" alt="" width="72" height="144" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1974-Berry-Bros.-Rudd-150x300.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1974-Berry-Bros.-Rudd-75x150.jpg 75w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1974-Berry-Bros.-Rudd.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 72px) 100vw, 72px" /></a>Comment:</strong> This rare baby is surprisingly powerful at 43% with a cherry-like sherry influence, gunpowder sulphur and loads of plums. Altogether a smaller version of the BBR Talisker 1972 &#8211; really good and unique with quite some spiciness.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Talisker 50 y.o. &#8218;Secret Stills 01.01&#8216; G&amp;M (Gordon &amp; Macphail), 1955 &#8211; 2005, Sherry Cask 1312, 45%<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1955-Secret-Stills-1.1-GM.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2291" title="Talisker 1955 Secret Stills 1.1 G&amp;M" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1955-Secret-Stills-1.1-GM-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1955-Secret-Stills-1.1-GM-225x300.jpg 225w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1955-Secret-Stills-1.1-GM-112x150.jpg 112w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Talisker-1955-Secret-Stills-1.1-GM.jpg 480w" sizes="(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></a>Comment:</strong> Deep dark plummy notes (jam of ripe dark fruits), peppery spice, brooding but also balanced at the same time, mainly on maraschino cherry, coal and red dark grapes. Polished mahogani and a maritime character join the complex nose right from the start. However, it keeps changing, now we have ginger bread, milk chocolate cookie, even vanilla and toffee in the foreground. This legend tastes much smoother than expected, high class without too much of a chili catch. It goes on with whiffs of humidor, coffee, matches and christmas cake. The grand finale is ultralong on great sherry and coal dust, gunpowder-sulphur and dark fruit.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 92+</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Runners-Up at the Whisky-Walk (Caperdonich 1972, Port Ellen 1981, BenRiach 1976 etc.)</title>
		<link>https://www.slowdrink.de/2011/10/review-runners-up/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Scotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisk(e)y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BenRiach 1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berry Bros.& Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bewertung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackadder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowmore 1987]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caperdonich 1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Laing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Malt Cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Ellen 1981]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regensburger Whisky Walk 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slowdrink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springbank 1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tastingnotiz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.slowdrink.de/?p=1078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As promised, I am going to reveal the runners-up #2, #3 and the only slightly trailing #4 with some quick notes now. No dram disappointed on that night whatsoever, but some where better than others. The Prince Regent 8 y.o. &#8230; <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/2011/10/review-runners-up/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As promised, I am going to reveal the <strong>runners-up #2, #3 and the only slightly trailing #4 </strong>with some quick notes now. No dram <a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-11.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1096" title="Regensburg-Walk-11" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-11-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-11-300x199.jpg 300w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-11-150x99.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-11.jpg 690w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>disappointed on that night whatsoever, but some where better than<span id="more-1078"></span> others. The <strong>Prince Regent 8 y.o. Pure Malt</strong> (see own review: <strong>92/100</strong>) has already been mentioned and would have taken a spot at #2 along with the <strong>SMWS Ardbeg</strong> (<strong>92/100</strong>, with its own article), and the <strong>Grappa Berta Riserva del Fondatore 1989</strong> ran in its own category (<strong>91/100</strong>, see review) and would have finished as runner-up #3.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Runners-Up #2:</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Caperdonich 1972 &#8218;the Octave&#8216; (Duncan Taylor) for Malts and More, 38 y.o., 1972 &#8211; 2011, Cask 414293, 71 btl., 52,5% (finished 3 months in Sherry Octave)</strong></span></p>
<p>Recently, Caperdonich whiskies, especially from 1972, found a well-deserved spot in the hearts of connoisseurs. Our friend Thomas Mansen imported this one and it is no exception to the rule. It is awesome. I usually don&#8217;t fancy the idea behind the Octave bottlings, but here it worked again.</p>
<p>An amazing <strong>fruit basket</strong> (apples, pineapples, figs, green grapes, peaches, cherries, Riesling-grapes) that is kept from being kitsch by <strong>perfectly balanced spices and an amazing freshness</strong>. The sherry is already well-integrated and not dominating, it adds darker fruits to the <strong>utterly complex</strong> mix. Butterscotch, vanilla, almonds, cinnamon, pepper and white oak can also be found. The palate screams <strong>&#8222;input overload!&#8220;</strong> This juice doesn&#8217;t need water but can &#8222;swim well&#8220;.</p>
<p>At a price below 140 Euro, this is a <strong>must-have</strong>. Maybe Thomas from <strong>Malts and More</strong> will take 5% off from the bottle price if you mention that you read about this one on <span style="text-decoration: underline;">www.slowdrink.de</span>.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 92</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Port Ellen 1981 Old Malt Cask (Douglas Laing), 18 y.o., 12.1981 &#8211; 11.2000, Sherry Cask, 444 btl., 50%</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-25.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-1097 alignleft" title="Regensburg-Walk-25" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-25-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-25-300x168.jpg 300w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-25-150x84.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-25.jpg 782w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>Many people say that Port Ellen malts should be drunk at a young age when they still have untamed power, oil and dirt. This is quite true, but we could recently see that PE ages really well without losing too much of its character &#8211; maybe even more so than other Islay drams. So here is the good news: We can drink Port Ellen at any age. As people get older version more often, I decided to put a younger bottling in the line-up.</p>
<p>The Sherry is there but not in a lead role. This role is taken by <strong>coastal Islay notes</strong>. We have sweet malt, peat, sulphur, blue cheese, an oily port rope, iodine, chalk and dark fruits. Modern Islay whiskies rarely can only hold a candle to this profile. Despite a brooding power underneath, this is so <strong>easy to drink</strong> and in great balance. Simply a great and slightly untypical PE for fans of complex peated whisky with secondary and tertiary notes.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 92</strong></p>
<p>________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p><strong>Runners-up #3:</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Benriach 1976 Signatory, 29 y.o., 22.12.1976 &#8211; 16.01.2006, Cask 9441, 401 btl., 54,6%</strong></span></p>
<p>Many 1976 Benriach have been great, but I would not go as far as to say that this is the best vintage. I love BenRiach and try to taste<a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-17.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1104" title="Regensburg-Walk-17" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-17-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-17-300x199.jpg 300w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-17-150x99.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Regensburg-Walk-17.jpg 686w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a> everything I can get from them as they are so <strong>versatile</strong> and mostly high class.</p>
<p>This bottling has the <strong>typical notes</strong> (freshness by acidity, tangerines, oranges, apricots, apples, yes, grapefruits as well, vanilla, a hint of berries like cassis) and Chardonnay-grapes, kiwi and passion fruit. There are more expressive 1976ers out there, but this is more than decent. It is a bit <strong>fragile</strong> &#8211; which it has in common with many old Laddies. So place this one early in your tasting (we had it too late and after a hearty meal). Under the right circumstances it really unfolds.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Springbank (Longrow) 1992 Berry Bros. &amp; Rudd, 1992 &#8211; 2009, Cask 71, 46%</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Walkers.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1105" title="Walkers" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Walkers-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Walkers-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Walkers-150x100.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Walkers.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>Marketed as Springbank, this clearly is peaty Longrow at its finest. Really typical (medicinical, mineral, smoky and herbal, slightly farmyardy, cedar resin, pine, lemon zest, stinging nettle, hints of fruits and leather) and <strong>high class</strong>, also very complex yet aggressive. I would have loved to try this at cask strength. Nice iodine notes accompany the long finish.</p>
<p>There is a follow-up bottling that has been released this year that is said to be as good. The older young Longrows around the early 1990ies are really promising. Seems like <strong>Longrow is back</strong> on track &#8211; and it makes a great contribution to the peat genre!</p>
<p><strong>Score: 91</strong></p>
<p>________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p><strong>Runner-Up #4:</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Bowmore 1987 Blackadder Raw Cask, 21 y.o., 1987 &#8211; 2009, Bourbon Hogshead 2783, 257 btl., 48,7%</strong></span></p>
<p>Bowmore of that vintage really splits the tasters: Some people simply dislike the profile of that time (lavender, chlorine, ferny forest floor), others find it really interesting. This phenomenon happened with this bottling as well and the scores were all over the place. I must admit that I am on the side of Bowmore-fans, whatever the age. For me, this was a nice dram.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 88+<br />
</strong></p>
<p>________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>As you can see, this line-up was on a very high level throughout. That&#8217;s how we like it <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Come join us next time!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Tasting-2011-rwwc-12.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-large wp-image-1099" title="Tasting 2011 rwwc 1" src="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Tasting-2011-rwwc-12-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="465" srcset="https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Tasting-2011-rwwc-12-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Tasting-2011-rwwc-12-150x112.jpg 150w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Tasting-2011-rwwc-12-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.slowdrink.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Tasting-2011-rwwc-12.jpg 1600w" sizes="(max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
